« Weekend | Main | Monday »

October 31, 2005

Confused Americans for Truth - Judge Alito for Supreme Court

by Ferdinand T Cat

alito.jpg A while back, Peg-Eye Nate asked me the first things I would do when I took over the world. There were two high priorities as I saw them: (1) Buy a controlling interest in Sargento's Cheese. (2) Pass a constitutional amendment requiring the government to obey the Constitution.

In order to achieve something similar to my second goal, President Bush is nominating Third Circuit Federal Appeals Court Judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. You have probably already seen this morning dozens of copies of the AP picture on the left in which it appears he is trying to simulate a smile while listening to Al Franken tell jokes about the war in Iraq. Aside from the picture, we've dug up the following links.


Our favorite radio talk-show host-- former Supreme Court clerk Laura Ingraham-- will be all over this story for the next few days. (A reliable free stream of her daily show is available here from 9am to noon ET.)

The most common Alito decision mentioned in stories about his career is his dissent in the Third Circuit decision on Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Alito argued that a provision requiring a married woman to notify her husband prior to the abortion did not violate the privacy clause. The Supreme Court later established a new criterion for laws modifying abortion rights-- the standard of undue burden-- and struck down the husband-notification clause as an example of such a burden.

Alito is a strong proponent of free speech, which means he may offer some hope of protecting blogs from campaign finance laws, and freedom of religion, which means he may be helpful in slowing the march to erase Christianity from the public square. Among his decisions relating to these rights:

  • A majority opinion in ACLU vs. Schundler, allowing a holiday display that included a nativity scene, a menorah, and Frosty the Snowman.
  • A majority opinion in Saxe v. State College Area School District arguing that non-vulgar private speech by students did not constitute sexual harassment if it did not disrupt a student's ability to learn. The case in question involved a student's right to state that homosexuality is a sin.
  • A majority opinion in Fraternal Order of Police v Newark Police Department in which a policy prohibiting police officers from growing beards was struck down because it did not allow exceptions for religious practices.
  • A majority opinion in Edwards v California University of Pennsylvania arguing that colleges have the right to set standards for curriculum materials, arguing that the University, not Edwards, is the speaker when he is teaching in the University's name, and therefore curriculum standards are a legitimate expression of the University's free speech rights.

While reading Alito's opinions during the research phase of this article, I was struck by his repeated use of precedent and his reasonable interpretations of the letter of the law. Although I am not a lawyer, I am a superior life form, and therefore I think I'm qualified to hold this opinion. I am also encouraged by the irrelevance of the initial Democratic attacks against him. According to Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid:

The nomination of Judge Alito requires an especially long hard look by the Senate because of what happened last week to Harriet Miers. Conservative activists forced Miers to withdraw from consideration for this same Supreme Court seat because she was not radical enough for them. Now the Senate needs to find out if the man replacing Miers is too radical for the American people.

And from Democratic political consultant Jim Jordan

It's a pretty predictable move from a politically crippled president. Toss out a judicial extremist to pacify his base and provoke a fight that he hopes changes the subject away from indictments and Iraq and Katrina and a soft economy.

That kind of rhetoric actually sounds far more extremist than any of Alito's opinions. Future complaints, however, will probably focus on Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which will be seen as evidence Alito poses a danger to Roe v. Wade. Yet Alito did not try to overturn Roe v. Wade, he merely argued in favor of a restriction on the abortion process. A Pew Research report puts most of the public is in exactly that position: 65% of the public opposes overturning Roe, but a majority think there should be more restrictions on it.

My priority, however, will still be the same: it's time for the Republican leadership to come down clearly and fearlessly in favor of a court that interprets the law without changing it. Our liberties are not protected by God, by a covenant with a King, or by the fact we can vote: they are protected by the limits set on government in the Constitution, and quite frankly, a flexible, living Constitution is just not safe.

Respectfully submitted,

Ferdinand T. Cat


# At Mon 9:04 AM | Permalink | Trackback URI | Comments (2) | More Confused Americans for Truth

Trackback Pings

» The Gloves Are Off!!! from Oblogatory Anecdotes
This is a very gutsy move for the President and vindicates him for the Miers fiasco. It shows that the President has indeed gotten the message and will no longer alow the minority Democrats to dictate who his nominees will be. It will not be easy to ... [Read More]

Tracked on October 31, 2005 9:42 AM

» Bush Nominates Samuel A. Alito for Supreme Court from Stop The ACLU
You like this banner, go get one at Blogs For Bush Per Fox News, which I am watching: Bush has picked Samuel A. Alito, according to the AP, as the next nominee to replace O’Connor at the Supreme Court. Now being reported via: Breitbart and C... [Read More]

Tracked on October 31, 2005 11:26 AM

» Samuel Alito new SCOTUS Nominee from T. Longren
Bush has nominated Samuel Alito to the supreme court. Many thought Alito would have been the nominee to replace Rehnquist, but that went to John Roberts. Various individuals appearing on Fox News yesterday threw Alito’s name out there, expecti... [Read More]

Tracked on October 31, 2005 11:40 AM

» Happy Halloween from NIF
Today's dose of NIF - News, Interesting & Funny ... Happy Halloween! (+Confirm Alito, +Open Trackbacks!) [Read More]

Tracked on October 31, 2005 3:55 PM

» Furry Logic from Cutting Edge Of Ecstasy
With the recent talk about amending the Constitution, I think we've overlooked the obvious. When Ferdinand The Conservative Cat takes over the world, he wants to 'Pass a constitutional amendment requiring the government to obey the Constitution. Darn, ... [Read More]

Tracked on November 2, 2005 2:00 AM

» #111 Best of Me Symphony from The Owner's Manual
All over the world, parents rely on school systems to teach children history and its lessons. How well is it working? Shiloh Musings proposes Imprinting Memory. [After leading the crowd in a kazoo chorus of There's No Business Like [Read More]

Tracked on January 8, 2006 11:12 PM

Comments

If liberty does not come from God then why be surprised when men take it? "Inalienable" means cannot be taken away except of course by the Creator.


Posted by: Jericho at October 31, 2005 5:44 PM

I'm not surprised, actually.

The Constitution, however, is supposed to be the instrument that protects those inalienable rights. In fact, the guy who wrote the "inalienable rights" line became very upset after the Marbury v. Madison decision that the Constitution had become "a thing of wax" in the hands of the Court:

"For intending to establish three departments, coordinate and independent, that they might check and balance one another, it has given, according to this opinion, to one of them alone the right to prescribe rules for the government of the others, and to that one, too, which is unelected by and independent of the nation. For experience has already shown that the impeachment it has provided is not even a scare-crow."

(For more Jefferson quotes on this subject, see http://www.landmarkcases.org/marbury/jefferson.html)


Posted by: Ferdy [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 1, 2005 7:38 AM

HTML is not allowed in comments; however, if you put in a raw URL (http://www.somewhere.com/page.html) it will automatically be converted to a link.. Also, it is likely your comment will not appear unless you refresh the page manually after posting it.

Post a comment